Alex Pereira Statement Ufc Loss: Aspinall Says 'Paris in September? I'll do that'

Tom Aspinall said 'Paris in September? I'll do that' after Ciryl Gane beat Alex Pereira at UFC Freedom 250, and he criticized what he called illegal elbows in the UFC loss.

By
Stephanie Grant
Editor
Sports reporter covering women's athletics, college sports, and the Olympics. Advocate for equal coverage in sports journalism.
17 Views
4 Min Read
0 Comments
Alex Pereira Statement Ufc Loss: Aspinall Says 'Paris in September? I'll do that'

said he will be ready to fight in an undisputed heavyweight title bout in Paris in September, making the matchup his immediate target after Gane's win over on Sunday.

Gane beat Pereira for the interim heavyweight title at at the White House, stopping Pereira in the second round after dropping him with a left hand and following with elbows that referee did not rule a foul. Aspinall reacted within hours, calling for the Paris date and offering the terse invitation: "Paris in September? I'll do that," and, "I'll go to Paris. Let me know. I'll be there."

The exchange matters because the first meeting between Aspinall and Gane ended with no winner. Their October fight was ruled a no contest after repeated eye pokes from Gane, a result that left the heavyweight picture unsettled and set a clear rematch narrative that would now carry a title implication.

Aspinall has been working back to full strength since surgery in February for damage to both eyes and said in May he was back in non-contact training. That recovery timeline is the practical fact behind his public readiness: he is positioning himself as medically available and publicly eager to travel to Paris in September for an undisputed title slot should the UFC make it official.

Still, Aspinall did not limit his comments to availability. He praised Gane's overall performance while also questioning the conduct that decided the fight: "He looked good. I have to watch that again. Looked like there was a lot of illegal elbows going on. Illegal punches but generally he looked good," Aspinall said, and added more pointedly, "[The elbows] look a bit illegal," followed by, "They look very illegal. What is going on? Dropped him with a jab and he's swinging now trying to finish him."

The dual note — praise for Gane's power and public accusation of illegal strikes — is the friction running through the prospect of a Paris showdown. Gane has made it clear he is ready for a rematch, and the interim title now sits with him following the second-round stoppage at Freedom 250. Yet Aspinall's insistence on the illegality of the finishing sequence points at a potential pre-fight storyline that would be part precedent, part grievance.

Practical questions remain. The UFC has not announced an Aspinall–Gane booking for Paris in September; Aspinall's statements are a clear offer, not a confirmed bout. The commission and UFC matchmaking must reconcile the medical paperwork after Aspinall's eye surgeries, a promotional push for a title fight in France, and the optics of rematching a fighter who was accused publicly of fouls in consecutive high-profile moments.

For fans and officials, the matter to watch is simple: will the promotion accept Aspinall's public challenge and schedule the undisputed title fight in Paris, or will the combination of medical returns and the disputed finish over Pereira slow the process? Gane’s demonstrated willingness to rematch and his new interim belt make him an obvious candidate, but an official booking would require the UFC to move past both the no contest from October and the fresh complaints about the elbows that ended Sunday’s fight.

If the card in Paris materializes in September, the fight will carry added stakes beyond a single belt. It would be the rematch that the sport has been waiting for since October, a test of whether Aspinall's recovery has returned him to title form and whether any lingering controversy from Gane's stoppage of Pereira will shape the bout's reception. For now, Aspinall has done what fighters do—declare readiness and set a location: "I'll go to Paris. Let me know. I'll be there." The booking, not the bravado, is the unanswered piece.

Share
Editor

Sports reporter covering women's athletics, college sports, and the Olympics. Advocate for equal coverage in sports journalism.