Lawmaker’s Attorney Demands Records Retention for Potential Suit Post Failed Charges
In a significant development, the attorney for Democratic Rep. Jason Crow is urging the preservation of records amid concerns of further legal action following a failed grand jury indictment. Crow, a Colorado lawmaker, along with five others, was involved in a controversy after they released a video urging military personnel to reject illegal orders.
Attorney’s Demand for Records Retention
Abbe Lowell, Crow’s attorney, addressed U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro in a letter emphasizing the need for her office to maintain all documents and communications related to the matter. This request comes after reports indicated that a grand jury opted not to indict Crow and his colleagues.
- Crow was part of a group of six Democratic lawmakers advocating defiance against unconstitutional orders.
- The lawmakers included veterans and former national security officials.
Responses from Lawmakers
In response to the legal situation, Rep. Crow has made it clear that he will not relent in defending his rights and beliefs. He expressed confidence, stating, “He will not be intimidated or silenced.” Crow’s colleagues, Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin, emphasized the importance of remaining proactive regarding their legal options.
They, along with Senator Dick Durbin, have reached out to federal authorities, urging them to preserve relevant documents. Slotkin specifically demanded confirmation that the case against Crow would not be pursued further, advocating for transparency in the process.
Legal Context of the Allegations
The allegations against the lawmakers stemmed from a potential violation of a statute concerning military insubordination. This law poses serious penalties, including a ten-year prison sentence, for individuals who allegedly incite disloyalty or refusal of duty among military members.
Lowell’s letter pointedly criticized the Justice Department’s motivations, characterizing the efforts to indict Crow as a misuse of power shaped by political retribution. He outlined the necessity for probable cause before any investigation could continue, arguing that continued actions against Crow would be legally actionable.
Defense of Democracy
Throughout his military career as a paratrooper and Army Ranger, Rep. Crow has voiced his commitment to safeguarding democracy. His attorney’s strong letter underlines this commitment and opposes any attempts at intimidation through legal channels.
In the face of potential litigation, the situation highlights the ongoing tensions between elected officials and federal prosecutors, raising questions about the boundaries of political expression and legal accountability in the context of military directives.
For further developments on this story, stay tuned to Filmogaz.com.
