South Korean Ex-Premier Sentenced to 23 Years for Martial Law Role
A significant legal development unfolded in South Korea as former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo was sentenced to 23 years in prison. This verdict comes after a three-judge panel in Seoul found him guilty of supporting the imposition of martial law under former President Yoon Suk Yeol. The martial law, declared on December 3, 2024, lasted just six hours but plunged the nation into a considerable political crisis.
Martial Law and Its Implications
The court’s ruling, delivered by Judge Lee Jin-kwan, characterized Yoon’s martial law declaration as an act of insurrection. The judge noted that this action had the potential to return South Korea to a state of dictatorship. In the judgment, Han was deemed a key collaborator in this insurrection, undermining his constitutional obligations as prime minister.
Key Details of the Case
- Date of Martial Law Declaration: December 3, 2024
- Duration of Martial Law: 6 hours
- Han Duck-soo’s Age: 76 years
- Judge: Lee Jin-kwan
During the martial law, Yoon suspended political activities and positioned troops to occupy the National Assembly. The declaration was partly justified by alleged election fraud that sparked intense scrutiny and opposition. However, it was quickly repealed by the National Assembly amidst public resistance.
Fallout and Legal Proceedings
Following the collapse of martial law, Han became acting president but soon faced impeachment himself. The Assembly accused him of collaborating with Yoon’s authoritarian measures. Initially, prosecutors sought a 15-year prison term, but the court opted for a more stringent sentence in light of Han’s critical role in the events.
Judge Lee emphasized that Han failed to uphold his duties to protect constitutional integrity. The judge recounted how Han actively participated in cabinet meetings to support Yoon’s unlawful actions and even attempted to forge documentation to legitimize the martial law declaration.
In addition to his collaboration, Han was also found guilty of perjury after evidence contradicted his claims of ignorance regarding martial law strategies. Closed-circuit footage implicated him in receiving pertinent documents during a cabinet meeting.
Next Steps in Legal Proceedings
As the legal process continues, a separate panel will determine whether Yoon acted as the instigator of the insurrection on February 19. Prosecutors in that case have proposed the death penalty for Yoon, further intensifying the political crisis in South Korea.
In a statement prior to his arrest, Han indicated that he would accept the court’s decision, albeit his legal team has one week to file an appeal. This case underlines the significant tensions within South Korean politics and the ongoing repercussions of martial law in the nation.
