King Mitchy Feud Pulls Seyi Tinubu Into Dispute Over Six‑Day School Renovation
A social media spat originating from a six‑day school renovation has escalated into a broader confrontation that names Seyi Tinubu and raises allegations of threats and political motive. Content creator king mitchy has posted evidence of spending and defended the project as meaningful charity, while activist VeryDarkMan has accused her of being used for political image laundering and later said his life was being threatened.
King Mitchy and the six‑day school renovation
Michelle Mukoro, known online as King Mitchy, shared footage of a project she said transformed a dilapidated school in Delta State within six days. The speed of the work, she framed, was intended to demonstrate how quickly change can occur when there is committed intent; critics, however, pointed to clips showing parts of the building still partially damaged.
In defence of her intervention, king mitchy published transaction receipts that indicated she had spent more than N1m on the renovation. Those receipts were presented as a tangible response to scepticism about the scope and authenticity of the work.
VeryDarkMan alleges threats and names Seyi Tinubu
Martins Vincent Otse, the online activist who uses the handle VeryDarkMan, interpreted some of King Mitchy’s public comments as indirect digs at him and then broadened his criticism to argue the project was politically motivated. He accused King Mitchy of serving as a vehicle to improve the public perception of President Bola Tinubu’s administration and explicitly tagged Seyi Tinubu in a post casting the charity as symptomatic of government failure.
As the exchange intensified, VeryDarkMan posted that he was receiving threats to his life and named Seyi Tinubu alongside King Mitchy as parties involved in those threats. The allegation of threats followed his claim that the intervention was politically charged and that an associate had been planted to gather information at King Mitchy’s restaurant.
Evidence, motive and public response
The dispute moved rapidly from celebratory video to contested narrative: King Mitchy’s six‑day completion claim and more than N1m in receipts became central pieces of evidence; VeryDarkMan’s accusations turned the conversation toward political intent and personal safety. The cause—King Mitchy’s public celebration of a fast renovation and her comments about integrity—produced the effect of a public, multi‑party confrontation that has drawn in the President’s family name and raised questions about the relationship between celebrity philanthropy and politics.
What makes this notable is how a single charitable act intended to showcase swift impact has become a flashpoint for wider accusations, from incomplete work to political instrumentalization and alleged threats. The timing matters because the dispute unfolded online and escalated quickly, prompting both visual scrutiny of the renovation and claims that go beyond property repairs to personal security.
Social media users supplied much of the scrutiny by sharing clips that suggested some sections remained damaged even after the announced six‑day work. In response, King Mitchy sought to substantiate her account by releasing financial records tied to the project.
Neither side has produced an independent verification of the renovation’s final condition or a formal, third‑party assessment of the receipts. The exchange nevertheless highlights the way digital platforms can compress a local philanthropic act into national political controversy within hours, and leave questions about motives and safety unresolved.
The parties named in the dispute include King Mitchy, VeryDarkMan—Martins Vincent Otse—and Seyi Tinubu. Beyond the immediate back‑and‑forth, the episode has prompted broader public debate about how charitable gestures are documented and politicized in the age of influencer activism.
