Lawmakers Refuse to Cooperate with Illegal Orders Video Inquiry
Three Democratic lawmakers have announced they will not engage with the Justice Department’s inquiry into a video they created. The video encourages military service members to resist illegal orders, which has led to a controversial investigation.
Lawmakers Reject Inquiry into Video on Illegal Orders
Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin and Pennsylvania Representatives Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan have chosen to refuse an interview request from Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. The request is part of an investigation that follows the video’s release, which President Trump condemned as acts of sedition.
Context of the Investigation
In the video, six lawmakers, all with military or intelligence backgrounds, assert that their viewpoints align with established military law and are protected by free speech. They view the investigation as an intimidation tactic against Congress members who criticize the administration’s defense policies.
Statements from Lawmakers
- Chrissy Houlahan, an Air Force veteran, expressed concern about government overreach. She stated, “What is happening now crosses a line.”
- Chris Deluzio, a former Navy officer, has vocalized his intention not to succumb to intimidation, citing numerous threats directed at him and others by the president.
- Elissa Slotkin, who organized the video, indicated that she might pursue legal action if the investigation continues.
Legal Implications
The escalated inquiry comes after these lawmakers previously declined an interview request from the FBI’s counterterrorism division. Slotkin’s attorney, Preet Bharara, has already issued a “notice of anticipated litigation” to the Justice Department. This indicates her potential legal action for infringement of constitutional rights, should they not cease their inquiry.
Additionally, other lawmakers, including Jason Crow and Maggie Goodlander, have received similar interview requests. They have also characterized these inquiries as threats designed to intimidate.
Potential for Legal Battles
The unfolding situation highlights the friction between political expression and perceived threats from the federal government. The possibility of legal challenges looms as concerned lawmakers prepare to defend their rights amidst this contentious atmosphere.
As the situation develops, further actions from the Justice Department and the involved lawmakers could escalate to the courts, making it a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue regarding military law and free speech.
