Prosecutor Claims Maradona’s Life Could Have Been Saved by Doctors
The criminal trial over Diego Maradona’s death has resumed in San Isidro, on the northern outskirts of Buenos Aires.
Seven healthcare workers face charges linked to his care after brain surgery in November 2020. The proceedings restarted nearly a year after the first trial was annulled.
Prosecutor’s case and accusations
Prosecutor Patricio Ferrari opened the new hearings with sharp criticism of the medical team. He described the caregivers as inexperienced and said they committed serious omissions.
A prosecutor claims Maradona’s life could have been saved by doctors if they had arranged a timely transfer to a clinic. Ferrari added that the football legend began to deteriorate about 12 hours before he died.
Details of the alleged failures
Maradona died while convalescing at home two weeks after surgery for a brain clot. The official causes were heart failure and acute pulmonary edema.
Lawyer Fernando Burlando told the court no stethoscope was placed on Maradona between November 11 and 25. The period covers the two weeks before his death.
Defence response and medical history
The defendants argue Maradona died of natural causes after a long health decline. They say the death followed an unavoidable deterioration in his condition.
Among the accused are doctors, psychologists and nurses. Psychiatrist Agustina Cosachov is represented by Vadim Mischanchuk. Former doctor Leopoldo Luque is also named in the case.
Charges and potential penalties
The seven face homicide charges for pursuing a course of action that may have led to death. Convictions could carry prison terms ranging from eight to 25 years.
About 120 witnesses are expected to testify. The trial is not likely to conclude before July.
Family presence and public reaction
Maradona’s daughters Dalma, Gianinna and Jana attended the hearing. His former partner Veronica Ojeda was also present and urged the judiciary to deliver justice.
Outside the courthouse, roughly 50 supporters waved Argentine flags and demanded accountability. They displayed signs invoking Maradona’s iconic number 10.
The case resumed after the first trial was voided when a presiding judge appeared in a documentary. That revelation led to the judge’s removal and the nullification of prior hearings.
Filmogaz.com will follow developments as the trial continues and more testimony is heard. The proceedings remain a focal point for fans and legal observers alike.
