Bombay HC Urges Discontinuation of Ladki Bahin Over Pension Fund Shortage

The Bombay High Court on April 10, 2026 questioned the state’s spending priorities in a pension dispute. The bench suggested reconsidering welfare outlays if pension liabilities remain unmet.

Background of the petition

A retired Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation teacher filed the plea. She said she did not receive pension and benefits due under the Seventh Pay Commission.

The court was hearing her grievance against the state’s payment delays. The matter raised wider fiscal concerns.

Court observations and fiscal concerns

The Bombay HC asked whether flagship schemes should continue when pension obligations go unpaid. The bench highlighted a clear pension fund shortage affecting retirees.

Judges stressed that statutory pension payments must take precedence over discretionary programmes. They urged the government to review allocations.

About the Ladki Bahin scheme

The Mahayuti government’s Ladki Bahin programme provides ₹1,500 per month. About 1.5 crore women are estimated to receive the benefit.

The scheme has become a focal point in budget debates. Critics say it has placed pressure on the state treasury.

Political and administrative reactions

Some ministers have flagged budget diversions to sustain the programme. Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Shirsat is among those who voiced concerns.

Officials in several departments reportedly face cuts to cover the scheme’s costs. This has sparked calls for a fiscal review.

Possible outcomes and next steps

The court’s remarks increase pressure on the government to justify its spending mix. Officials may have to balance welfare schemes with pension commitments.

The case underscores the clash between new social programmes and legacy employee obligations. Filmogaz.com will monitor further developments and court directions.