Indiana Vs Purdue: Boilermakers Dominate 93-64 at Mackey Arena
The indiana vs purdue matchup on Feb. 20, 2026 ended in a lopsided 93-64 victory for Purdue at Mackey Arena, a result that shifted momentum in the conference standings and underscored persistent offensive issues for Indiana. The margin and manner of the win matter now because they highlight stark contrasts in execution and depth as both teams move deeper into the Big Ten schedule.
Indiana Vs Purdue — Development details
Purdue built a 46-29 lead by halftime and never relented, finishing with a 93-64 score. Early in the game, Trey Kaufman-Renn converted an and-one jumper that extended Purdue’s lead to 26-14, a sequence that set the tone for much of the contest. Kaufman-Renn finished with 20 points, using both scoring and playmaking to keep Indiana off balance.
The Boilermakers shot an efficient 64. 7% for the game and improved to 66. 7% in the second half, numbers that reflected sustained offensive rhythm rather than an isolated hot stretch. Purdue totaled 24 assists against just seven turnovers, and the team knocked down 10 of 18 three-point attempts while scoring 34 points in the paint.
Indiana struggled to match that efficiency. Lamar Wilkerson led the Hoosiers with 20 points, but he did not make a field goal until fewer than 15 minutes remained in the second half, a drought that left Indiana chasing for large portions of the game. Wilkerson had entered the contest averaging a Big Ten-high 24. 2 points per league game, but his delayed scoring and a lack of consistent looks from deep contributed to Indiana’s offensive stagnation. Indiana took just eight first-half three-point attempts and 20 for the game, below the 29. 4 attempts they averaged coming into the contest.
Context and pressure points
The result came in a hostile environment where early slippage can be difficult to overcome. Indiana’s slow start — 5 of 14 shooting and four turnovers over the opening stretch — created a deficit that grew quickly. Purdue’s willingness to attack off the catch and in transition, plus its ability to find shooters after early defensive attention on Kaufman-Renn, amplified pressure on the Hoosiers’ perimeter defense.
What makes this notable is the combination of Purdue’s efficiency and Indiana’s curtailed shot volume from beyond the arc. The Boilermakers’ shared playmaking and inside scoring undermined Indiana’s primary offensive options, forcing the Hoosiers into late clock possessions and low-percentage attempts. That structural imbalance has immediate consequences for how Indiana must prepare offensively in the next phase of the schedule.
Immediate impact
The loss dropped Indiana to 17-10 overall and 8-8 in conference play. Beyond the record, the defeat exposed lineup and execution problems that coaches will need to address quickly: stagnation on offense, a failure to generate consistent three-point opportunities compared with season norms, and gaps in defending ball movement and interior scoring. Purdue’s balanced scoring approach and efficient half-court offense placed the Hoosiers on the back foot for most of the night.
Players’ statistics reflect those dynamics—Purdue’s assist-to-turnover margin and high shooting percentages indicate both ball security and shot selection advantages, while Indiana’s lower volume and delayed scoring from its leading guard signaled an inability to create rhythm against pressure defense.
Forward outlook
Indiana returns to action on Tuesday when the Hoosiers host Northwestern; that game is the next confirmed milestone on Indiana’s schedule. The immediate objective for Indiana will be to restore offensive flow, increase perimeter activity to approach prior season averages, and limit early turnovers that have led to quick deficits. For Purdue, the win reinforces a model of efficient scoring and shared playmaking the team will look to sustain as the regular season continues.
Coaches from both sides will take this contest into their short-term planning. Indiana must translate lessons from the loss into tangible adjustments before Tuesday’s tip-off, while Purdue will aim to carry its shooting and ball movement into upcoming conference matchups. The coming week will show whether this result was an outlier or an inflection point in both teams’ conference campaigns.
