Rogue MP Challenges Littleproud for Leadership
On January 28, 2026, tensions within the Australian National Party escalated as backbencher Colin Boyce announced plans to challenge party leader David Littleproud. Boyce’s intentions come after a week marked by controversy, including Littleproud’s decision to instigate a split from the Coalition.
Colin Boyce’s Leadership Challenge
Colin Boyce, known for his denial of climate change, expressed his belief that Littleproud’s leadership deserves scrutiny. He emphasized the need for an open discussion regarding the direction of the party. “The National party is committing political suicide by removing itself from the Coalition,” Boyce stated during an interview with Sky News.
Details of the Spill Motion
Boyce announced that he would introduce a spill motion in the National party room. This motion is meant to provide party members an opportunity to evaluate Littleproud’s leadership amidst growing dissatisfaction.
- Date of Spill Motion: January 30, 2026
- Key Opponent: David Littleproud
- Potential Supporters: None currently mobilizing for change.
Littleproud’s Previous Challenges
Littleproud has faced previous leadership challenges, notably from Senator Matt Canavan, who garnered more significant backing than Boyce. While some party members are discontent with Littleproud’s actions surrounding the Coalition split, credible contenders such as Canavan, Bridget McKenzie, Michael McCormack, and Darren Chester have not actively sought to contest his leadership.
Boyce’s Critique of Littleproud
Boyce accused Littleproud of failing to manage the political fallout effectively. He suggested that if the party continues in its current direction, it is heading towards potential disaster. “They won’t have any resources; they won’t have travel entitlements,” he added, highlighting the challenges the party may face alone.
Future Implications
Overall, while Boyce’s challenge represents a significant moment for the Nationals, it appears to lack the substantive support needed to effectively oust Littleproud from leadership. Meanwhile, the party’s future remains uncertain, particularly regarding its position against emerging threats from competing political entities like One Nation.
As the situation develops, the dynamics within the National Party will be worth monitoring to understand the implications for its leadership and strategy moving forward.
