SA GP Disqualified for Unhealthy Obsession with Laser Therapy
The South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal has disqualified Adelaide GP Mark Rogers for professional misconduct related to low-level laser therapy (LLLT). This decision follows an investigation initiated by the Medical Board of Australia, which found serious violations of medical conduct by Dr. Rogers.
Details of the Allegations
Mark Rogers faced six allegations, including:
- Failing to provide adequate patient care.
- Neglecting to disclose a potential conflict of interest.
- Making false statements to regulatory authorities.
- Engaging in financial dealings with a patient.
- Breaching prior commitments to the Medical Board.
- Not complying with the conditions of his medical registration.
Rogers’ History with Laser Therapy
Dr. Rogers has over 30 years of experience as a general practitioner. He was a strong advocate for low-level laser therapy, even making claims about its effectiveness in treating Alzheimer’s disease, which he later admitted were false. In 2019, he received a two-month suspension and was barred from offering LLLT services.
Tribunal Findings
The tribunal found that between 2017 and 2020, Dr. Rogers demonstrated a “blatant disregard” for previous warnings and conditions set by the Medical Board. In its ruling, the tribunal noted, “Dr. Rogers has an unhealthy obsession with LLLT that has jeopardized his medical career.”
Impact of the Ruling
Dr. Rogers expressed regret about his obsession with LLLT, stating that it had a detrimental impact on his life and career. He acknowledged difficulties in refraining from discussing the therapy with patients, which violated his commitments to the Medical Board.
Mental Health Considerations
The tribunal also considered Dr. Rogers’ mental health, noting that he has bipolar disorder. However, expert witnesses confirmed that his condition is currently well-managed and does not pose a risk to the public. The tribunal acknowledged that he has shown significant improvement since 2020, practicing without incident.
Conclusion of the Tribunal
Ultimately, the tribunal found Dr. Rogers to be unreliable as a witness. They emphasized that he knowingly disregarded the rules despite previous sanctions. His registration was canceled, and he is barred from reapplying for 18 months. This case underscores the need for strict adherence to medical regulations and the potential consequences of misconduct.
