Allegations Emerge That Norwegian Scientist Built and Tested Secret Energy Device Tied to Havana Syndrome
February 15, 2026 ET — New coverage claims a Norwegian scientist constructed and tested a covert energy device in 2024 that some observers now connect to the cluster of unexplained neurological incidents known as Havana syndrome. The allegations have intensified scrutiny of long-running investigations into the illness and prompted fresh questions about how such equipment, if real, could be detected or countered.
Claims about the device and the 2024 tests
The emerging account portrays a small, portable instrument designed to emit a focused form of energy. The device is said to have been developed and trialed in 2024, with testing described as deliberate and limited in scope. Details released so far are sparse: technical characteristics are not publicly documented, the precise nature of the energy emitted has not been independently verified, and motives for development remain murky.
Those linking the device to Havana syndrome say the timeline of the alleged tests aligns with episodes of acute symptoms recorded among foreign service personnel and intelligence operatives: headaches, dizziness, cognitive difficulties and sensory disturbances. Medical investigators and clinicians have struggled to identify a single clear biological cause for the syndrome, and the newly surfaced claims now add a potential technological vector to the debate.
Reactions from investigators, scientists and officials
The possibility that a man-made energy device could produce the cluster of neurologic complaints that define Havana syndrome has been a subject of contention for years. Experts caution that correlation does not equal causation: establishing a causal link requires rigorous replication, peer-reviewed data and validated measurements of any emissions associated with the alleged device.
Medical authorities emphasize the need for systematic clinical evaluation of affected individuals, standardized testing protocols and transparent sharing of technical evidence. Intelligence and law-enforcement agencies are being urged to pursue forensic analysis that could confirm whether a device existed, where tests took place, and whether any recorded emissions match the symptom profile observed in patients.
Diplomatic and national-security officials face a delicate balance: the imperative to protect personnel and gather facts competes with the risk of amplifying unproven claims. The emergence of these allegations is likely to renew calls for coordinated international inquiry and for investment in detection technologies that could identify unusual directed-energy signals in real time.
Implications for research, policy and affected individuals
If investigators verify that a clandestine energy device was built and tested, the implications would be broad. Scientific teams would need to replicate the device’s emissions under controlled conditions to assess biological plausibility. Health agencies might expand screening and long-term follow-up for those exposed, while security services would examine whether similar devices exist elsewhere and what countermeasures are feasible.
For victims and their advocates, renewed attention could lead to greater access to specialized care and compensation programs, but it could also raise complex legal and diplomatic questions. Governments will need to decide how to respond publicly while preserving the integrity of sensitive investigations.
At this stage, the claims remain allegations. Verifiable technical data, transparent laboratory tests and independent medical analyses will be necessary before scientists can draw firm conclusions about causation. The coming weeks are likely to see intensified investigative activity as authorities seek to corroborate elements of the account and evaluate any concrete threats to personnel and facilities.
