House Approves Spending Bill Amid Democratic Opposition to ICE

ago 2 hours
House Approves Spending Bill Amid Democratic Opposition to ICE

The recent approval by the House of a significant spending bill comes amid considerable opposition from Democratic lawmakers regarding ICE funding. Representative Rosa DeLauro highlighted that a lapse in funding would allow Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to maintain operations for several years, while other agencies might face furloughs and operational cuts.

House Spending Bill Details

The spending measure, which garnered mixed responses, includes a total allocation of $839.2 billion for the Defense Department. This figure aligns with the budget that Congress approved in the annual defense policy bill and exceeds former President Trump’s budget request by $8 billion.

Democratic Support and Opposition

Despite the contentious nature of the bill, seven Democrats crossed party lines to vote in favor. They include:

  • Don Davis – North Carolina
  • Henry Cuellar – Texas
  • Laura Gillen – New York
  • Marie Gluesenkamp Perez – Washington
  • Vicente Gonzalez – Texas
  • Jared Golden – Maine
  • Tom Suozzi – New York

Representative DeLauro, who participated in negotiating the homeland security legislation, ultimately chose to oppose the bill due to concerns about ICE funding.

Additional Provisions in the Bill

The legislation also incorporates extensions for several programs nearing expiration. Notable mentions include:

  • National Flood Insurance Program
  • African Growth and Opportunity Act

The latter grants duty-free access to the U.S. market for approximately thirty-six African nations.

Republican Commentary on the Bill

Republican leaders praised the spending package for limiting cuts proposed by Trump while making minimal reductions across various government agencies. Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma commented on the bipartisan negotiations, noting that this package underscored the necessity for compromise and shared responsibility in governance.

This spending legislation reflects an ongoing struggle between budgetary priorities and political ideologies, particularly concerning ICE and immigration enforcement policies.