Liz Hurley Reveals Her Home and Phone Were Bugged in Court Testimony
Elizabeth Hurley has made a startling revelation during her testimony in a High Court privacy lawsuit in London. She claims that her home and landlines were bugged, describing this as a “brutal invasion of privacy.” The lawsuit is a collective action involving several high-profile figures, including Prince Harry and Elton John, against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail.
Key Details from the Court Hearing
- Date of Testimony: January 2026
- Claimants: Elizabeth Hurley, Prince Harry, Elton John, among others
- Defendant: Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday
- Nature of Allegations: Involvement in unlawful privacy violations from the early 1990s to 2010s
Hurley’s Emotional Testimony
During her testimony, the 60-year-old actress expressed her distress over the alleged illegal activities. She is claiming damages for 15 stories that she believes were based on unlawfully obtained information, including medical details related to her pregnancy with her son Damian. Hurley stated that she found it deeply hurtful, especially as her son became a public figure himself.
Hurley recounted how she was affected emotionally by the past media coverage, fearing that her son would someday read the negative articles about her. “I felt really mortified that my son would be able to read all this stuff one day,” she said, her voice tinged with emotion as she confronted the republished articles.
Invasion of Privacy Claims
The actress made serious allegations about her privacy being violated, claiming that microphones were placed on her windows and her phone conversations were recorded without her consent. “The Mail’s unlawful acts against me involve landline tapping and other monstrous, staggering things,” Hurley explained.
She also rejected speculation that her friends had leaked information to the press. Notably, she disclosed that she had learned about potential phone hacking from her former boyfriend, actor Hugh Grant, back in 2015.
Legal Implications
In court, Associated Newspapers dismissed the allegations as “preposterous smears.” Much of the cross-examination focused on the timeframe of Hurley’s claims, with the publisher suggesting that she filed her lawsuit too late. Hurley’s emotional testimony and the disclosure of her experiences are expected to have significant implications for the ongoing case, which is highly publicized.
As the lawsuit unfolds, the actress’s poignant reflections on privacy in the digital age highlight the broader issues of media ethics and responsibility. Hurley’s bravery in recounting her experiences underscores the emotional toll such invasions can have on individuals, particularly those in the public eye.
For more updates on this and other stories, stay tuned to Filmogaz.com.
