Meghan Trainor explains why she used a surrogate for baby No. 3 as fans ask what happened and what it means

Meghan Trainor says she used a surrogate because, after extensive conversations with her doctors, it was the safest way for her and her husband Daryl Sabara to continue growing their family. She stressed it wasn’t their first choice, but a medically guided decision aimed at reducing risk while welcoming their third child, a daughter named Mikey Moon.

The explanation comes as online chatter surged following the couple’s announcement, with many fans asking why Trainor didn’t carry the pregnancy herself after previously giving birth to two sons.

Why did Meghan Trainor use a surrogate?

Trainor’s answer is direct: safety. She has described a long decision-making process with her medical team that led them to surrogacy as the best option to expand their family without adding avoidable health risk. In the same breath, she’s tried to shift the conversation away from judgment and toward normalization—presenting surrogacy as a valid, “nothing-to-whisper-about” path to parenthood.

She also framed the choice as practical and protective rather than aesthetic or trend-driven, emphasizing that it was rooted in medical guidance, planning, and support.

• Meghan Trainor says surrogacy was chosen after extensive talks with doctors as the safest way to grow her family.

• She noted it wasn’t the couple’s first choice, but it became the most responsible option.

• Trainor has pushed back on judgment, framing surrogacy as a legitimate way to build a family.

• The announcement follows her previously public experiences with pregnancy and delivery, which shaped how the couple approached risk.

• The conversation has widened into a larger debate about privacy, medical decision-making, and how public figures share family choices.

The timing: the announcement and the immediate reaction

Trainor and Sabara revealed they welcomed their daughter in mid-January, sharing family photos and thanking the surrogate and medical teams involved. The public reaction quickly split into two lanes: celebration from supporters, and criticism from a smaller but loud group questioning the decision.

That split is part of why Trainor’s explanation matters. When celebrities address surrogacy, the discussion often moves beyond a single family’s story and into broader cultural assumptions—who “should” use a surrogate, what counts as a “medical reason,” and how much explanation the public is entitled to. Trainor’s stance has been clear: the family made a decision with doctors, and the outcome is a healthy baby and a safer path for everyone involved.

What Trainor’s past pregnancy experience adds to the context

Trainor has previously spoken publicly about the realities of pregnancy and delivery, including her C-sections and the challenges of the postpartum period. While she hasn’t presented a single dramatic “one reason” that drove the surrogate decision, her broader point is that pregnancy can carry real risks—and that families have the right to respond to those risks with the help of medical professionals.

That context explains why she framed the decision as “safest,” rather than as a preference. In celebrity news cycles, surrogacy announcements can spark speculation; Trainor’s language aims to limit that by placing the decision inside a doctor-led, risk-reduction framework.

The bigger takeaway: surrogacy, stigma, and the pressure to justify

Trainor’s comments also underline a frustrating reality: people who choose surrogacy are often pushed to defend it publicly in ways that people who conceive and carry pregnancies are not. Her message has been that building a family can involve science, planning, and teamwork—and that those elements shouldn’t automatically trigger suspicion or shame.

A short historical context helps explain why this keeps becoming a headline: for years, public conversations about surrogacy have swung between celebration and stigma, especially when the parents are famous. As more public figures share their family-building choices, the debate often returns to the same friction point—medical privacy versus public curiosity—without always respecting that reproductive decisions rarely fit into neat categories.

What happens next for Meghan Trainor and her family

In the near term, the focus is likely to stay on two things: Trainor’s continued efforts to normalize surrogacy in the face of criticism, and the practical realities of life as a family of five. If she continues speaking about it, expect her to keep emphasizing the same themes—medical safety, gratitude for the surrogate, and the idea that families can be built in more than one “acceptable” way.

The clearest signal to watch is whether the conversation cools as the news cycle moves on, or whether Trainor’s comments spark broader follow-up discussions about the kinds of scrutiny women face around pregnancy choices. For now, she appears intent on drawing a firm boundary: the “why” is safety, and the “what it means” is that the family is growing—without apology.

FAQ

Did Meghan Trainor say surrogacy was a medical decision?
Yes. She said the decision followed extensive conversations with doctors and was chosen as the safest path for her family.

Was surrogacy Meghan Trainor’s first choice?
No. She said it wasn’t their first choice, but it became the safest option after weighing everything with her medical team.

Is Meghan Trainor responding to criticism?
Yes. She has addressed judgment directly, emphasizing that surrogacy is a valid and legitimate way to build a family.