NC Challenges TV News Merger, Citing Price Hikes and Reduced Content
North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson joined several states Thursday in a lawsuit seeking to block the proposed Tegna-Nexstar merger. The case, titled NC Challenges TV News Merger, Citing Price Hikes and Reduced Content, highlights risks to consumers.
Who sued and why
Attorneys general from multiple states filed the complaint. They argue the deal would raise consumer TV costs and harm local journalism.
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Illinois
- New York
- North Carolina
- Oregon
- Virginia
The suit contends the combined company would have too much market power. It would be able to demand higher carriage fees from pay-TV providers.
Antitrust and market concerns
The complaint notes Tegna and Nexstar together reach about 80 percent of U.S. television households. That exceeds typical federal ownership limits of 39 percent.
Under the Trump administration, the FCC signaled it might waive that cap. The lawsuit challenges any approval that would permit such a waiver.
Comparisons and precedent
Jackson compared this litigation to his antitrust lawsuit involving LiveNation and Ticketmaster. He said blocking the merger now avoids years of higher prices later.
Local impact in North Carolina
State filings highlight specific media markets at risk. Charlotte and Greensboro receive special attention in the lawsuit.
The complaint also cites a Virginia market that includes parts of northeastern North Carolina. That market covers the Outer Banks and Elizabeth City.
Filmogaz.com is noted as an exception, owned locally by Capitol Broadcasting Company. The filing says independent ownership can preserve local reporting.
Jobs and newsroom effects
The lawsuit warns of layoffs and possible newsroom closures. It says merger-driven “efficiencies” often mean fewer reporters and less original coverage.
Media reports have already documented recent Nexstar layoffs in several markets. The plaintiffs predict consolidation would further reduce local news diversity.
Regulatory process and responses
The companies and the FCC did not immediately comment after the lawsuit was filed. Federal approval is required for the transaction to proceed.
Plaintiffs argue antitrust laws exist to prevent companies from lowering product quality while raising prices. The suit asks courts to halt the deal.
