How David Ellison’s $31 Bid Forces Warner Bros. Discovery’s Board to Choose — and What Could Shift Next

How David Ellison’s $31 Bid Forces Warner Bros. Discovery’s Board to Choose — and What Could Shift Next

If you’re asking what changes because of the reopening to Paramount, the immediate consequence is a compressed decision point that reshapes negotiating leverage and timelines. The seven-day window for a competing bid turns shareholder clarity into a binary comparison between Netflix’s existing $83 billion agreement and a revived Paramount Skydance pitch led by david ellison, raising fresh questions about timing, process and strategic priorities.

David Ellison’s move shifts the calculus for the board and for Netflix

By reintroducing a $31-per-share offer, Paramount has prompted Warner Bros. Discovery’s board to reassess a deal that Netflix previously signed. That reassessment matters more than optics: it forces directors to evaluate competing valuation structures (one framed as a standalone share price, the other built into a larger $83 billion package) and to weigh the certainty of a signed agreement against new financial terms brought forward in a tight window.

  • Implication: The board must balance headline share pricing against the components that drive the $83 billion agreement.
  • Affected groups: shareholders who will receive the board’s guidance, executives on both negotiating teams, and strategic partners watching theatrical and streaming commitments.
  • Next signals that would clarify momentum: whether Paramount supplements its $31-per-share pitch within the seven-day window and whether any procedural questions about prior deadlines remain unresolved.
  • Operational impact: public debate over the bids has already prompted executive-level commentary on exhibition windows and post-theatrical rights.

Here’s the part that matters: the renewed bid doesn’t just change numbers — it rewrites the immediate governance choice the board must make.

Event details embedded: offers, claims and the narrow window

The current situation, as it stands in public statements, includes a few concrete pieces. Warner Bros. Discovery reopened the door to Paramount after a raised pitch of $31 per share, and the board will weigh that offer against the $83 billion agreement Netflix previously signed. Netflix’s deal structure has been described internally as $27. 75 per share plus the value of Discovery Global, creating two different valuation approaches for the board to compare.

Ted Sarandos has been vocally defending his company’s bid and strategy. He frames the seven-day window as a short hurdle for Paramount to deliver clarity rather than a fundamental disruption. Sarandos criticized the Paramount Skydance team and its leader for spreading what he called misinformation, and he summed up the public noise as cheaper than actually raising a bid. He also reiterated commitments tied to theatrical exhibition: a maintained 45-day theatrical window and preservation of the existing paid-download home entertainment window so that streaming on either platform would not begin on Day 46.

The wider cultural and commercial arguments are active as well. Sarandos pointed to lost competition with another platform over Academy Awards TV-rights as part of broader strategy conversations, and he praised Warner Bros. Discovery’s clarity around the bid process while criticizing Paramount for missing deadlines and presenting unclear offers.

What’s easy to miss is how tightly process questions—deadlines, what assets are actually for sale and the composition of each offer—have become the decisive factors, not just headline pricing.

If you're wondering why this keeps coming up, the seven-day window effectively compresses negotiation, scrutiny and shareholder choice into a concentrated period, making procedural clarity and supplemental detail from each bidder the likely immediate drivers of the outcome.

Minor uncertainty remains about how the board will weigh differing valuation frameworks and whether any additional financial adjustments will be filed during the window. Recent updates indicate active debate and public positioning; details may evolve as the board weighs both offers.