Lomax Saga Unfolds: Leaked Texts Between Storm and NRL Revealed
In a developing legal battle, the Parramatta Eels are embroiled in a conflict with the Melbourne Storm over star winger Zac Lomax. This clash centers on Lomax’s contract situation, dating back to a release that allows him to pursue opportunities, which is now under scrutiny.
Lomax’s Contract Situation
Zac Lomax, who had a four-year contract worth $700,000 annually with the Eels, was granted a release to explore options in the global rugby union competition, R360. After R360 failed to launch, Lomax found himself in contract limbo.
Legal Proceedings Ahead
The Eels and Lomax are headed for a showdown in the New South Wales Supreme Court, scheduled for March 2. This hearing will determine whether Parramatta can prevent Lomax from signing with the Storm without their consent until October 31, 2028.
Negotiations and Allegations
- According to court documents, Parramatta granted Lomax a release but included a clause prohibiting him from signing with other NRL clubs without consent.
- The documents reveal that negotiations took place between the Storm and the Eels, where chairman Matt Tripp proposed a transfer fee that increased from $100,000 to $200,000 shortly thereafter.
- The Eels claim Tripp indicated the NRL might take punitive action regarding their salary cap if they did not allow Lomax’s transfer.
- Furthermore, Storm CEO Justin Rodski allegedly asked the NRL to intervene and “apply the blowtorch” on the Eels to expedite the process.
Storm’s Transfer Offers
The Storm’s offer included a total of $300,000, with a portion designated for salary cap relief. Despite ongoing negotiations, the Eels assert that they were confronted with unreasonable demands during discussions.
Next Steps in the Legal Battle
Lomax’s legal representation argues that the Eels are unlawfully withholding consent for his transfer. They contend that the deed of release is no longer applicable under current circumstances.
As the situation unfolds, Lomax’s future with the Storm hangs in the balance. His chance to participate in the season opener against the Eels will depend entirely on whether the two clubs can reach an agreement before the court ruling.
As the March 2 hearing approaches, all eyes will be on the outcome and its potential implications for both Lomax and the respective clubs involved.
