Capgemini Criticized for Key Role in Migrant Tracking with ICE Collaboration

Capgemini Criticized for Key Role in Migrant Tracking with ICE Collaboration

Capgemini, the French information technology consulting firm, is facing heightened criticism over its contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The agreement was initially disclosed by l’Observatoire des multinationales, highlighting concerns surrounding the firm’s involvement in migrant tracking.

Details of the Controversial Contract

Capgemini’s U.S. subsidiary, Capgemini Government Solutions (CGS), is engaged in “skip tracing” services under this contract. This process involves utilizing data to locate individuals whose whereabouts are unknown. It is intended to support ICE in verifying addresses and facilitating removal operations.

  • Contract Value: The contract is valued at over $365 million, with approximately $4.8 million already allotted.
  • Performance Bonuses: The contract includes a monetary incentive structure, rewarding contractors for efficient service delivery.
  • Data Sources: Contractors use a mix of government data, commercial databases, and public records to confirm individual locations.

Implications of ICE Collaboration

The contract has prompted allegations of employing private “bounty hunters” for tracking immigrants. Reports indicate that at least ten companies could profit significantly from this initiative, with Capgemini projected to receive the largest share. Aiman Ezzat, CEO of Capgemini, stated that senior management only became aware of the contract through media channels.

Historical Context and Dependency

Capgemini has had a longstanding connection with ICE, dating back nearly two decades. Recent data reveals that 65% of federal contracts awarded to Capgemini were with ICE. Concerns over this relationship were exacerbated by a 2021 audit, which revealed performance issues regarding contractor oversight and staffing requirements.

  • Audit Findings: The audit from the DHS Office of Inspector General indicated the possibility of ICE overpaying for services due to inadequate contract monitoring.
  • Revolving Door Phenomenon: Many employees have transitioned between ICE and CGS, fostering a level of continuity and operational knowledge.

Growing Pressure from Stakeholders

The revelations about Capgemini’s role with ICE have sparked significant backlash. Unions, politicians, and elements of the French government have called for greater transparency. The CFDT union condemned the ICE contract while demanding clarity from Capgemini amidst job cuts affecting 2,400 positions in France.

French Finance Minister Roland Lescure urged Capgemini to clarify its activities with ICE. Defense Minister Catherine Vautrin has also stressed the need for ethical scrutiny regarding such contracts. An extraordinary board meeting is scheduled, which may influence how European firms collaborate with U.S. security agencies in the future.