Andrew Tate Criticizes Charlie Kirk, Unveils Power Struggle with Candace Owens

In a revealing and controversial podcast episode, Andrew Tate sparked discussions surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk and the role of Candace Owens. On September 10, 2025, Kirk was fatally shot while addressing an audience at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Authorities later arrested 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson, charging him with aggravated murder in connection with the incident.

Andrew Tate’s Shocking Claims

During a recent interview with host Jack Neel, Andrew Tate made a bold claim regarding Kirk’s untimely death, stating, “I know who killed him.” He emphasized the need to tread carefully, alluding to potential dangers for himself. However, Tate refrained from naming any individuals or presenting evidence to substantiate his assertion.

Comments on Candace Owens

Tate’s discussion also included remarks about Candace Owens, an American commentator actively questioning the circumstances of Kirk’s death. According to Tate, Owens discusses potential suspects in a manner that is overlooked because of her perceived credibility issues. He suggested that the establishment allows her to voice these opinions since her authority is often underestimated.

Controversy Surrounding the Official Narrative

Owens has expressed skepticism about the official account of the shooting. She has publicly indicated that she does not believe Tyler Robinson acted alone and stated, “I now can say with full confidence that I believe Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the leadership of Turning Point USA and some of the very people who eulogized him on stage.” Her comments have incited significant debate within media circles.

Key Points from Andrew Tate’s Podcast

• Tate inferred the existence of a deeper power struggle surrounding Kirk’s death.
• He highlighted a disparity in how comments from men and women are received in the public arena.
• Owens remains vocal about her theories despite facing backlash for her views.

The ongoing dialogue initiated by Tate and Owens raises questions about accountability and the influence of power dynamics in public discourse. As the situation unfolds, many are left wondering about the implications of their statements and the truth behind Kirk’s tragic murder.