Elizabeth Hurley Testifies in UK Court on ‘Brutal Privacy Invasion’
Elizabeth Hurley has made headlines by testifying in a UK court regarding a significant invasion of her privacy. The actor described feeling emotionally overwhelmed as she discussed her experiences with surveillance. Hurley’s statements are part of a larger lawsuit against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail, which includes other high-profile claimants. These allegations cover a span from the early 1990s to the 2010s.
Details of the Privacy Invasion Case
- Claimants: Elizabeth Hurley, Prince Harry, Elton John, and four others.
- Defendant: Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.
- Allegations: Unlawful collection of private information, including illicit surveillance.
- Period Covered: Early 1990s to 2010s.
Testimony Highlights
During her testimony, Hurley, now 60, described how her landlines and home were bugged. She claimed microphones were placed in her residence, allowing intrusion into her personal conversations. Hurley recounted how hurtful this discovery was, particularly revelations she learned in 2020.
Her emotional account included details about specific stories involving her, such as medical aspects of her pregnancy with her son, Damian, and disputes with his late father, Steve Bing. She emphasized that these narratives emerged from unlawfully obtained information.
Support in Court
Prince Harry was present to offer his support during Hurley’s testimony. She conveyed her frustration when questioned about whether she could have acted sooner regarding the alleged privacy violations. The court’s cross-examination focused on how and when Hurley became aware of the phone hacking issue.
Hurley mentioned learning about widespread phone tapping through her former partner, actor Hugh Grant, in 2015. While speaking of her experience, she noted that she had received damages amounting to £350,000 (approximately $469,770), which she donated to the ‘Hacked Off’ campaign, a group advocating for press reform.
Implications of the Lawsuit
Associated Newspapers has dubbed the claims as “preposterous smears,” firmly denying any wrongdoings. The case is part of a larger movement among celebrities taking a stand against press misconduct. The unfolding testimonies are likely to keep the public and media engaged as the trial progresses.
