Kamala Harris’ Incompetence Exposed Again: Shapiro’s Insight

Kamala Harris faces renewed scrutiny after Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro countered claims made in her memoir, “107 Days.” Shapiro’s strong rebuttal highlights tensions within the Democratic Party and raises questions about Harris’s political acumen.

Contention Between Harris and Shapiro

In her memoir, Harris suggested that Shapiro insisted on being involved in every decision if appointed vice president. Shapiro refuted this, calling her account “blatant lies” and “bullsh–.” His forthcoming memoir reveals more damaging insights into the vetting process he underwent while being considered for the role.

Explosive Revelations

Shapiro’s memoir discusses a troubling instance where he was asked if he had ever been an Israeli agent. This question has drawn considerable criticism, reinforcing perceptions that Harris’s team may have displayed insensitivity or even antisemitism. Former officials, including Joe Biden’s envoys on antisemitism, have labeled the query as “horrifying.”

Political Memoirs and Retaliation

The fallout from memoirs in the political realm often leads to heated exchanges. Notable examples include Arthur Schlesinger’s “A Thousand Days,” which angered members of JFK’s administration. Similarly, George H.W. Bush’s aide Charlie Kolb faced backlash for his critical memoir, “White House Daze.” The reactions underscore how memoirs can ignite strong responses from those involved.

Historical Context of Memoir Retaliation

• Schlesinger’s account prompted criticism from Jackie Kennedy and other insiders.
• Tom Scully, a Bush staffer, claimed Kolb was ostracized after his tell-all book.
• Scott McLellan’s memoir, “What Happened,” faced organized pushback from the Bush administration.

Harris’s situation serves as a cautionary tale for politicians. The decision to name individuals in memoirs, like Shapiro, invites significant blowback. While memoirs are a part of political life, they require a tactful approach to avoid unnecessary conflict.

Conclusion

Kamala Harris’s clash with Josh Shapiro highlights her potential missteps in navigating complex political relationships. As her story unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the perils that come with political memoirs and the importance of strategic representation in the public eye.