CNN: Walz Discussed Foreign Ties During Harris Vetting, Sources Confirm
During the vetting process for Kamala Harris’ running mate in the 2020 presidential election, Tim Walz and Josh Shapiro were both asked about potential connections to foreign governments. According to four sources familiar with the vetting, Walz, the Governor of Minnesota, faced questions about his past trips to China. Similarly, Shapiro was questioned about whether he had ever acted as an agent for Israel, which he noted in an upcoming memoir.
Controversial Vetting Questions
Shapiro described the inquiry as offensive, suggesting that it was rooted in antisemitism due to his Jewish heritage. He recounted this in advance excerpts from his memoir. Shapiro’s criticism of Dana Remus, who led the vetting process, sparked significant backlash from associates of former President Barack Obama, with whom Remus has strong ties.
Background on the Candidates
- Josh Shapiro: Currently the Governor of Pennsylvania, he has a lengthy resume, including volunteer work in Israel.
- Tim Walz: Governor of Minnesota, he has made multiple trips to China during his career.
Shapiro’s relationship with Harris has been complex, and their interactions during the vetting process seem to indicate potential challenges in collaboration moving forward. Harris has previously expressed concerns regarding Shapiro’s ability to accept a subordinate role should they collaborate.
Responses from the Jewish Community
The inquiries provoked outrage among detractors who viewed them through the lens of rising antisemitism. Deborah Lipstadt, former special envoy for antisemitism, labeled the questions as “classic antisemitism.” Rabbi David Wolpe highlighted the absurdity by comparing the treatment of Shapiro to asking Walz about hypothetical ties to Germany or Switzerland.
The Nature of the Questions
Proponents of the vetting process defended the inclusion of such inquiries as standard protocol for high-level political positions. They argue that uncomfortable questions serve to ensure transparency, regardless of the speculative nature of the allegations. The aim is to document clear answers on record, according to someone close to Remus.
Conclusion
As both Walz and Shapiro prepare for their political futures amid potential presidential runs in 2028, the discussions surrounding foreign agent allegations will likely influence their political dynamics. Neither Shapiro nor Walz provided comments directly related to the controversies when approached, highlighting the sensitive nature of these discussions.
