India’s World Cup decisions threaten Varun, Abhishek as Live Cricket Scores flash doubts
India’s selectors and fans face immediate selection uncertainty as Varun Chakravarthy and Abhishek Sharma could be left out, risking balance in the final; 9: 14 a. m. ET saw renewed scrutiny after Sunil Gavaskar urged Abhishek be dropped and commentary questioned Varun’s recent form, with live cricket scores tracking the match impact.
Varun Chakravarthy’s recent four-game slump shows up on Live Cricket Scores
Varun Chakravarthy’s recent sequence has directly raised questions for India’s final XI: across his last four games he bowled 16 overs, conceding 186 runs for four wickets, an economy of 11. 63. That single run-rate spike has put the top-ranked bowler’s place under the microscope ahead of the decider.
Before this patch, Varun’s 2026 numbers reflected strong returns, with 17 wickets in 11 games at 8. 90 an over; live cricket scores earlier in the tournament had tracked him as a leading wicket-taker. The contrast between those returns and his recent spells is central to current selection debates.
Sunil Gavaskar’s push to drop Abhishek Sharma forces selectors to weigh roles
Veteran commentator Sunil Gavaskar wants Abhishek Sharma dropped for the T20 World Cup final, saying the batter “hasn’t learned from his dismissals. ” That public call intensifies pressure on India’s selectors to decide whether immediate changes are needed to shore up the middle order.
Selectors are presented with concrete alternatives named in recent analysis: Kuldeep Yadav if a wrist-spinner is preferred, Washington Sundar to strengthen batting depth, or Mohammed Siraj to add a pace option. Each choice would alter the XI’s balance in a different direction.
Kuldeep Yadav, Washington Sundar and Mohammed Siraj framed as direct tactical swaps
Strategic tweaks under consideration are specific. Kuldeep Yadav is described as the wrist-spinner who would replace a spin specialist; Washington Sundar is cast as the batting reinforcement; Mohammed Siraj is positioned as the extra fast bowler. Those three roles map directly to the on-field gaps flagged by recent poor spells.
Match moments that fed the debate are detailed: in Ahmedabad, South Africa were 20-3 when Suryakumar Yadav introduced Varun in the fifth over; David Miller edged one for four, lofted another over mid-off, and later hit a six after Varun returned, while Dewald Brevis cut and then launched a six off Varun. Opponents frequently reached the pitch of the ball and attacked him relatively like a seamer, undermining his usual variation-based plans.
Against England, Varun began short before adjusting; Jacob Bethell struck three sixes off successive balls and Will Jacks joined the attack, leaving Varun visibly stretched for answers. Separately, Varun’s list of expensive spells shows three of his six most expensive figures occurred within this four-game phase, and three of his ten costliest spells came in the series immediately before the World Cup, against New Zealand—details that feed calls for a change.
If India’s selectors choose Kuldeep Yadav, Washington Sundar or Mohammed Siraj for the final, Varun Chakravarthy or Abhishek Sharma would be omitted from the playing XI.
