Robert Horry praises Spurs’ unselfish formula as playoffs near

Saturday at 9: 15 a. m. ET, robert horry pointed to the San Antonio Spurs’ willingness to ride the hot hand—rather than defaulting to one star—as a core reason the team has stayed consistent in the 2025-26 season. The timing matters now because the regular season is nearing its finish and the playoffs are approaching, turning San Antonio’s identity into a live debate: sustainable system, or a style vulnerable to cold shooting nights?

Robert Horry’s podcast comments spotlight San Antonio’s shared-offense approach

On his podcast, Robert Horry described the Spurs as operating “like no other” team in a league where contenders often lean heavily on superstars to close out wins. His point: San Antonio’s structure gives different players room to take charge without a fight for touches.

Horry framed it as an ego check—if one player has it going, teammates don’t try to interrupt the rhythm. “If you’re the best player tonight, be the best player, ” he said, adding the line that’s become the summary of his message: “If someone’s cooking, let them cook. ”

The Spurs’ season results in the context provided show why that observation is landing now. San Antonio’s success hasn’t entirely depended on Victor Wembanyama, even with Wembanyama still described as the team’s best performer. The Spurs are also described as a top-eight team on both offense and defense this year, and they sit 2. 5 wins away from securing the best record in the regular season.

Victor Wembanyama numbers and Spurs shooting depth show the “why now”

The discussion has sharpened as the postseason gets closer and expectations rise. Wembanyama is averaging 23. 7 points, 11. 2 rebounds, and a league-leading 3. 0 blocks per game, yet the roster’s production is spread out: six different players are averaging double-digit points.

San Antonio’s shooting profile in the context also supports the idea of a collective offense. Five players are shooting better than 80% from the free-throw line, and six players are shooting better than 34% from three-point range. Those markers help explain why robert horry credits the Spurs’ balance for their week-to-week steadiness, even as outside voices wonder whether a less star-centric approach could limit Wembanyama’s ceiling.

Coach Johnson’s team is also portrayed as benefiting from multiple players learning when to take over, a structure Horry suggested can hold up even if a “star is out of the lineup. ” With the playoffs approaching, the same shared-responsibility habit is being framed as a potential advantage against more experienced opponents—especially on nights when Wembanyama isn’t at his best.

Nate Duncan, De’Aaron Fox, and January shooting slump fuel Spurs skepticism

The optimism around a balanced system is running alongside a growing “elephant in the room, ” as skepticism persists about how reliable the Spurs’ offense will be under postseason pressure. On a recent podcast, NBA analyst Nate Duncan questioned the Spurs’ offense even while acknowledging their depth and relative lack of injury issues since early in the year.

Duncan’s critique landed harder after a poor offensive showing at Madison Square Garden against the New York Knicks days later, which the context says “proved Duncan right to some degree. ” The split-screen view of the Spurs is clear in the examples provided: at their best, they can look overwhelming—such as a 131-91 demolition of the Philadelphia 76ers—yet when the offense breaks down, it can turn “downright disastrous. ”

One specific marker in the context highlights that volatility: during January, the Spurs shot just 32. 4% from three. While the team has “gotten back on track scoring the ball, ” their shooting is still described as a wild card.

There are also player-specific questions. De’Aaron Fox is singled out as a concern because his offense “comes and goes, ” and Danny Leroux echoed that sentiment on a recent podcast appearance noted in the context. Taken together, those critiques frame the stakes for San Antonio’s unselfish model: it can generate multiple threats, but it can also leave the team exposed if perimeter shots stop falling or a key creator runs cold.

As of Saturday morning, the next stretch of regular-season games will determine whether the Spurs can maintain the top-end form shown during their 11-game win streak—when they ranked second in offensive rating—or whether the inconsistency flagged in January resurfaces heading into the playoffs. If the Spurs keep winning while sustaining their collective shot-making, their system-first identity will enter the postseason with momentum.