Judge Rejects Charles Bediako’s Request to Play Amid NCAA Lawsuit
In a significant ruling, a Tuscaloosa County circuit judge has denied basketball player Charles Bediako’s request for injunctive relief against the NCAA. This decision effectively ends a temporary order that previously allowed him to play for the University of Alabama while pursuing his lawsuit.
Details of the Ruling
Circuit Judge Daniel Pruet electronically filed the order on Monday. He declined Bediako’s motion for a preliminary injunction, which would have provided longer-term relief. The judge also dissolved a temporary restraining order that had been in place since January 21.
Background of the Lawsuit
- Date Filed: January 20, 2023
- Key Issue: Bediako’s eligibility to compete after leaving Alabama for the NBA draft.
- Contract Status: He signed a two-way professional contract and played in the NBA’s developmental G League.
The court’s decision followed a hearing on February 6, where attorneys for both Bediako and the NCAA presented their arguments. Bediako’s lawsuit challenges the NCAA’s ruling that deemed him ineligible to compete.
Judge’s Findings
In his assessment, Judge Pruet indicated that Bediako did not meet the legal standards necessary for a preliminary injunction. These standards required him to demonstrate irreparable harm, the absence of adequate legal remedy, and a reasonable chance of success on his claims.
- The judge noted that any potential lost income could be compensated with monetary damages.
- There was no indication that Bediako could not attend college if the injunction was not granted.
The lawsuit includes claims under Alabama’s antitrust laws and assertions of tortious interference. However, the court concluded that Bediako had not provided a reasonable likelihood of success regarding these claims. Questions arose concerning the applicability of Alabama antitrust law to actions occurring outside the state.
Impact on NCAA and Future Challenges
Judge Pruet highlighted concerns that granting the injunction could burden the NCAA by undermining its established eligibility standards. It could also pave the way for similar lawsuits across the country.
Ultimately, Bediako’s legal battle continues, but without the benefit of the injunctive relief that would have allowed him to compete while the lawsuit is pending.
