Democrats Defy DOJ Probe Over ‘Illegal Orders’ Video Allegations
Two Democratic lawmakers are standing firm against a Justice Department investigation related to a video that encouraged military personnel to reject illegal orders. Senator Elissa Slotkin from Michigan and Representative Chrissy Houlahan from Pennsylvania publicly announced their refusal to cooperate with the inquiry. This announcement highlights growing tensions between the Democratic representatives and the Trump administration.
Democrats Stand Against DOJ Probe
Senator Slotkin expressed her concerns, indicating that the Trump administration is using intimidation tactics to silence dissent. In her Thursday post, she stated that she officially informed Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro of her non-compliance with the investigation. “Intimidation is the point, and I’m not going to go along with that,” Slotkin emphasized.
Representative Houlahan echoed Slotkin’s sentiments. She expressed her determination not to comply with the Justice Department’s voluntary interview request, stating that such actions cross a significant line by turning federal power toward intimidation. Both lawmakers are part of a group of six Congressional members, including Reps. Jason Crow and Maggie Goodlander, who created the video in November urging military personnel to refuse illegal commands.
Background of the Video Controversy
The 90-second video encouraged military and intelligence personnel to defy illegal orders. The release of this video drew immediate criticism from President Trump, who labeled it “seditious behavior” and warned of severe consequences. Following the video’s publication, Slotkin and Houlahan reported an increase in threats to their safety and well-being.
Response from Congress Members
- All six lawmakers involved reported being contacted by federal prosecutors regarding the video.
- U.S. Attorney’s office for D.C. has sought interviews with lawmakers, as confirmed by Rep. Jason Crow’s office.
- Crow highlighted the administration’s intimidation and harassment of members of Congress, stating that it stemmed from Trump’s reaction to their actions.
Slotkin’s letter to Bondi and Pirro also urged them to preserve records related to the investigation, hinting at a potential lawsuit for constitutional rights infringement.
Continued Fallout from Video
The controversy has not only sparked reactions from lawmakers but also raised concerns about the safety of those involved. Following Trump’s posts on social media, threats against Slotkin and others have significantly increased. Crow remarked on Trump’s declarations against him, noting that he feels pressured for merely voicing dissent.
In a broader context, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has led actions against Senator Mark Kelly, who is also implicated in the video situation. Kelly is awaiting a legal ruling on his lawsuit over what he characterizes as unlawful and unconstitutional actions against him.
Conclusion
The refusal by Democrats to comply with the Justice Department’s probe raises serious issues regarding freedom of speech and government overreach. As the situation develops, the implications for both the lawmakers involved and the broader political landscape remain to be seen.
