Israeli Supreme Court Demands Netanyahu Justify Ben-Gvir’s Ministerial Role
The Israeli Supreme Court has mandated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to justify his decision not to dismiss National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. This order arose after the court noted Netanyahu had not taken action regarding Ben-Gvir’s position.
Supreme Court’s Conditional Order
The High Court issued a conditional order on the case, reflecting its significance. The panel hearing the matter has been expanded to nine justices because of its gravity. It includes notable legal figures such as:
- Supreme Court President Isaac Amit
- Deputy President Noam Sohlberg
- Justice Dafna Barak-Eraez
- Justice Yael Willner
- Justice Ofer Grosskopf
- Justice Alex Stein
- Justice Gila Kanfi-Steinitz
- Justice Khaled Kabub
- Justice Yechiel Kasher
Background of the Issue
At the core of the dispute are allegations that Ben-Gvir violated agreements with Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara. These agreements were intended to limit his authority over police operations, ensuring neutrality in law enforcement. Such frameworks are typical to prevent any minister from misusing their power.
Deadlines and Requirements
The court has set a timeline for the case. The state must submit a response by February 24, one month prior to the hearing, which is scheduled for March 24. Affidavits from both the Prime Minister and Ben-Gvir must be filed by March 10, while all other parties have until March 19 to submit additional materials.
Responses to the Court’s Decision
MK Gilad Kariv from The Democrats praised the Supreme Court’s decision. He stated that it was necessary for Netanyahu to confront Ben-Gvir’s alleged legal violations and the implications for police independence.
The protest group Ima Era, which is among the petitioners, expressed deep concern about Ben-Gvir’s continued position. They claim his actions threaten national security and risk endangering Israeli citizens.
Community Reactions
Ima Era emphasized their commitment to advocating for Israel’s future. They argue that extremist figures in government are jeopardizing public safety and using citizens as political pawns. As stated by the group, each day Ben-Gvir remains in office poses a risk to the security of the nation and its soldiers.
