Jury Deliberates in Rape Trial of Former Spandau Ballet Singer Ross Davidson

The jury is currently deliberating on the results of the rape trial involving former Spandau Ballet singer Ross Davidson. He faces serious allegations, including the rape of one woman in London and the attempted rape of another in Thailand. Davidson, known as Ross Wild in the music industry, has maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings.

Details of the Case Against Ross Davidson

Davidson, 37, from Aberdeen, was a prominent figure in the West End musical “We Will Rock You” and performed with the iconic band Spandau Ballet in 2018. The trial is taking place at Wood Green Crown Court in London.

He has pleaded not guilty to the rape of a woman in March 2015 in London. Additionally, he denies attempting to rape and sexually assault another woman in December 2019 while in Thailand. The prosecution has brought to light Davidson’s guilty plea to voyeurism related to the same incident in Thailand.

Prosecutor’s Arguments

Prosecutor Richard Hearnden presented a view of Davidson as someone who turned to rape and sexual assault, stemming from an expectation of having “sex on demand.” Hearnden emphasized the contrast between Davidson’s public persona as a “sex symbol” and the darker aspects revealed by his accusers.

Allegations from the Victims

• The first alleged victim claims Davidson attacked her while she was asleep in his bed, leaving her feeling “helpless” and “scared to react.”
• The second woman reported waking up in a hotel in Thailand to find Davidson attempting sexual contact without her consent or safe practices.

Evidence presented included videos on Davidson’s mobile phone that showed the second victim while she was asleep. Those videos were unknown to the woman until detectives informed her in 2023.

Davidson’s Defense

Davidson admitted to the charge of voyeurism but denied any accusations of sexual assault related to the same incident. He claimed that he believed he had permission to engage in intimate contact and expressed regret over filming without consent.

As the jury continues its deliberations, the outcome of this high-profile case remains uncertain. The implications of the verdict will undoubtedly resonate beyond the courtroom.