RLPA Defends Lomax with Strong Warning to Clubs
The Rugby League Players Association (RLPA) has issued a strong warning to clubs concerning the ongoing contract situation of Zac Lomax. The organization cautions that pressuring players into transfers is unacceptable and detrimental to the sport.
Background on Zac Lomax’s Contract Situation
In November, Zac Lomax received an early release from his contract with the Parramatta Eels. This release came with three years remaining on his deal, allowing Lomax to explore opportunities within the R360 competition. However, the R360 faced delays, pushing Lomax back into the NRL.
Interest from the Melbourne Storm
Currently, the Melbourne Storm have expressed interest in signing Lomax. However, his contract exit from Parramatta stipulates that he cannot play for another NRL team before 2029 unless the Eels consent. This agreement adds complexity to any potential transfer.
Eels Demand Compensation
The Eels have made their position clear regarding compensation for any potential move. They have identified specific players, such as:
- Xavier Coates
- Stefano Utoikamanu
- Jack Howarth
The club insists that they will not allow Lomax to join another team without appropriate compensation.
RLPA’s Stance on Player Pressure
Clint Newton, the RLPA chief executive, emphasized the importance of respecting player contracts. He stated that players should have the right to fulfill the terms of contracts they have signed. Newton expressed confidence that both involved clubs could reach a mutually beneficial resolution.
Newton’s Comments
Newton articulated the RLPA’s position clearly. He stated, “We don’t support horse-trading involving player movements.” He believes in the integrity of player contracts and stated that players like Lomax should be allowed to stay with their original clubs unless all parties agree to a transfer.
Eels’ Official Statement
Jim Sarantinos, the Eels’ chief executive, outlined the terms of Lomax’s release. He noted the inclusion of protective clauses to maintain the club’s interests while allowing the player to explore options outside the league. Sarantinos acknowledged that the situation had not unfolded as anticipated for Lomax but reiterated the need for fair exchange if he is to move.
Conclusion
The situation surrounding Zac Lomax remains complex, with the RLPA advocating for player rights as negotiations continue. Both the Eels and the Storm face the challenge of reaching a fair agreement that respects Lomax’s contractual obligations while also addressing the needs of both clubs.
