Border Patrol Chief Caught Lying About Previous ICE Surge
Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino, a controversial figure during the Trump administration’s immigration policies, has been accused of dishonesty in a federal court ruling. Judge Sara Ellis deemed him “not credible” and described his testimony as often evasive and misleading.
Key Findings from the Court Ruling
The findings emerged during a civil lawsuit involving the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) related to the enforcement actions known as Operation Midway Blitz in Chicago. Over three days of depositions, Judge Ellis noted Bovino’s tendency to provide deceptive answers when questioned about the use of force by Border Patrol agents.
- Bovino was characterized as “evasive” and “outright lying” during his testimony.
- The judge criticized his lack of credibility, underpinning her judgment with specific examples.
- DHS did not respond to inquiries regarding Bovino’s behavior during the investigation.
Operation Midway Blitz
Operation Midway Blitz took place last fall, drawing significant scrutiny. During this operation, Bovino and his team were deployed to major cities, including Chicago and Los Angeles, under policies aimed at tightening immigration enforcement.
Controversial Use of Force
Bovino has faced serious allegations regarding the escalation of force during protests. Video footage captured during the Chicago protests shows him authorizing the use of tear gas against crowds, despite being advised that such measures were unnecessary.
- Bovino stated, “If you need to deploy gas, deploy [expletive] gas.”
- He admitted during depositions that no warning was provided prior to the gas deployment.
- The judge highlighted Bovino’s contradictory statements, especially regarding his use of force against a protester.
Discrepancies in Testimony
Judge Ellis pointed out numerous contradictions in Bovino’s statements about the deployment of tear gas. Initially, he claimed he was struck by a rock, a narrative supported by DHS social media. However, over the course of his testimony, he revised that account, stating he was almost hit.
Ultimately, Judge Ellis concluded that Bovino’s misleading statements called into question the credibility of DHS as a whole. The ruling reflects broader concerns regarding transparency and accountability in federal immigration operations.
Implications of the Ruling
The findings against Bovino have raised significant questions regarding his future role and the operations of the Border Patrol under his leadership. As investigations continue, the spotlight remains on how federal agencies manage force and accountability during immigration enforcement actions.
