Stephanie Pratt Publicly Blasts Brother Spencer’s L.A. Mayoral Bid, Urges Voters to Reject Him

Stephanie Pratt has openly denounced her brother Spencer’s bid for mayor of Los Angeles, accusing him of seeking relevance rather than public service and urging residents not to back his challenge in next year’s election. The family rift adds a highly personal dimension to a campaign that has already drawn attention for its celebrity roots and outspoken critiques of city leadership.

Family feud plays out on social channels

In a series of public posts over the weekend, Stephanie cast doubt on her brother’s motives and qualifications for one of the country’s largest municipal offices. She praised some of the community work Spencer has done in their Pacific Palisades neighborhood but insisted that the city needs experienced leadership, calling a vote for him “a vote for stupidity. ”

Stephanie pushed back on efforts to rally family loyalty, writing that she could not support someone who she said physically harmed her as a teenager and who she linked to past drug problems. Those are allegations she set forth in her posts, and she framed her objection as both personal and civic: while she would not oppose her brother holding local office in a smaller community, she said he is not fit to manage a city of roughly four million people.

The controversy recalls a decades-long, on-again, off-again family dynamic that played out in the public eye during reality television years. The new flare-up comes at a moment when Spencer has been more active in public affairs following a devastating wildfire that destroyed his home in January 2025 and affected other members of the family. He marked the one-year anniversary of that fire by announcing his mayoral bid and has positioned himself as a populist outsider critical of current city leadership.

Campaign framed by wildfire losses and outsider appeal

Spencer has said the loss of his Palisades home and the broader handling of wildfire recovery helped drive his decision to run. He has cast himself as a critic of existing municipal policies and has indicated willingness to push for stronger enforcement in areas that concern him. The campaign has also overlapped with the release of a memoir, which his sister suggested is part of a bid to remain in the spotlight.

Despite his reality-TV background, Spencer’s backers have painted him as more than a celebrity candidate, saying privately that his blunt critique of state and local leaders resonates with some voters. He has embraced that outsider label publicly, though the family rebuke underscores the risks of a campaign built on personality rather than traditional political experience.

Political implications ahead of the June election

The mayoral election is scheduled for June 2, 2026 (ET), and Spencer’s candidacy adds an unpredictable element to a field that already faces intense scrutiny on issues such as public safety, homelessness, and disaster preparedness. Family opposition from a high-profile sibling could complicate his outreach to undecided voters and to constituencies that expect steadier credentials for citywide office.

For the Pratt family, the dispute is both private and public: it draws on years of personal history that played out in national tabloid attention and reality programming, while also intersecting with serious local concerns about recovery and governance. As the campaign season advances, voters and political observers will watch whether the personal allegations and public criticisms dampen Spencer’s momentum or instead sharpen his outsider appeal.

Whatever the outcome, the public split between the siblings is likely to remain part of the narrative surrounding the race, raising questions about how celebrity, personal history, and local crises converge in modern municipal politics.