Dana White Testifies on Matchmaking, Fighter Contracts in UFC Antitrust Hearing

Dana White Testifies on Matchmaking, Fighter Contracts in UFC Antitrust Hearing

UFC CEO Dana White recently provided testimony in ongoing antitrust lawsuits against the organization. This significant hearing, which lasted over two hours, centered on White’s communication methods and daily responsibilities within the UFC.

Key Highlights from Dana White’s Testimony

White was joined by Tracy Long, UFC’s vice president of athlete compliance and regulatory. Together, they confronted inquiries about missing communications that the plaintiffs seek for discovery. The hearing delved into phone usage, apps for business communication, and the history of their devices.

Technological Adaptations

During his testimony, White admitted his limited tech skills. He only transitioned to smartphones after UFC’s legal team emphasized the importance of retaining data for the lawsuits. Previously, he exclusively used flip phones and plans to revert once the cases conclude.

Changes in UFC Operations

White’s role evolved significantly since Endeavor’s acquisition of the UFC for $4.4 billion in 2016. Under previous ownership by his friend Lorenzo Fertitta, White was involved in nearly every aspect of the business. However, his responsibilities have shifted mainly to oversight rather than direct engagement.

  • Chief Business Officer: Hunter Campbell took charge of fighter negotiations and matchmaking.
  • Involvement: White maintains minimal interaction with contracts, directing fighters’ inquiries to matchmakers.
  • Matchmaker Team: Sean Shelby and Mick Maynard assist Campbell with matchmaking decisions.

Fighter Contracts and Negotiations

White’s involvement in fighter contracts has drastically diminished, stating, “Less than zero.” He clarified that while he does participate in discussions during the final stages of matchmaking, he is not involved in negotiations. Notably, he remarked, “You won’t find one manager on this planet who will tell you I’ve negotiated a deal in I don’t know how long.”

Missing Phone Incident

A notable aspect of the testimony was the discussion about a missing phone, which White believes was stolen by a former employee. This individual, described as a “runner” responsible for minor tasks, was allegedly caught stealing personal items. White speculated that this employee, a relative of Ari Emanuel, might have played a role in the theft.

Tracy Long’s Involvement

Tracy Long’s testimony mirrored White’s regarding communication methods. Although White does not use email or own a computer, Long utilizes both to communicate with fighters and managers. Nevertheless, she mostly refers negotiations to the UFC matchmakers, echoing the organizational structure established under Campbell.

What’s Next?

The hearing is set to continue, with Judge Richard Boulware expected to call key figures like Campbell and UFC videographer Elliott Howard to the stand. This ongoing trial will further examine the inner workings of UFC operations and its approach to fighter agreements.