The Soapbox: This Debate Isn’t About Safety or Criminal Deportation
The recent revelations from the ACLU of New Hampshire highlight a pressing concern regarding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The organization is reportedly planning the construction of a new detention facility in Merrimack, raising significant transparency issues for state and local governments. This situation has sparked a heated debate that is not merely about public safety or the deportation of criminals.
The Impact of ICE Expansion
Building a detention center would complicate local governance, implicating state and local authorities in practices that threaten due process and human rights. Sharing facilities with ICE or establishing new detention centers would constitute a serious misstep for New Hampshire.
Connections to Influential Figures
- The property targeted for this development is owned by Trammel Crow Company.
- The company’s former chairman, Harlan Crow, has ties to the Republican party as a political megadonor.
- His role raises ethical questions regarding the motivations behind this proposed expansion.
Statistics on ICE Custody
Recent statistics reveal alarming death rates in ICE custody. In just the first month of this year, six deaths were recorded. The previous year saw a total of 32 individuals die while detained.
The Consequences for Families
The expansion of ICE’s operations threatens to exacerbate family separations, with parents being removed from their children without regard for their rights. This situation represents a form of state-endorsed violence that is unacceptable in New Hampshire.
Political Accountability
New Hampshire Governor Ayotte has expressed a lack of awareness regarding ICE’s plans. This raises critical questions about either a profound ignorance of state agency actions or an intentional misrepresentation to the public. Both scenarios are troubling.
A Call to Action
The public must urge local leaders, including Governor Ayotte, to resist any efforts by ICE to build or expand detention facilities within their communities. New Hampshire should not partake in systems that foster intimidation and violate justice.
As the conversation around this issue evolves, residents are encouraged to engage and express their views. This dialogue is crucial for maintaining transparency and upholding community values.
