California Law Revives Marilyn Manson Sexual Assault Case by Former Assistant
A new chapter in the Marilyn Manson sexual assault case has unfolded with a recent ruling that revives a lawsuit filed by his former assistant, Ashley Walters. This decision comes a year after the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office opted not to pursue charges against the musician.
California Law Revives Marilyn Manson Sexual Assault Case
On January 7, 2026, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steve Cochran granted a motion for reconsideration, allowing Walters’ case to proceed. This development comes in light of a new California law aimed at giving survivors of sexual abuse more time to seek justice.
Background of the Case
Walters first filed her claims against Manson, whose real name is Brian Warner, in 2021. However, her case was nearly dismissed before the ruling on Monday. The new law, Assembly Bill 250, was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2025. It extends the eligibility period for reviving sexual assault claims that are typically barred by the statute of limitations.
- Effective Date: Just over three weeks prior to the court ruling.
- Eligibility Extension: Two additional years for individuals over 18.
- Impact: Allows claims barred before January 1, 2026, to be revived.
Details of the Ruling
Judge Cochran vacated the previous dismissal order that had been issued on December 16, 2025. He highlighted that the initial complaint was not filed until about ten years after the alleged incidents occurred, during Walters’ employment with Manson from 2010 to 2011. In a previous ruling, Cochran noted the difficulty of applying the delayed discovery doctrine in this case.
Walters’ attorney, Bina Ahmad, expressed excitement and determination, stating, “We are thrilled for Ms. Walters. She has never given up fighting for justice.” The legal team is ready to challenge Manson until he is held accountable for the allegations.
Manson’s Denial and Future Proceedings
Marilyn Manson has consistently denied all accusations of sexual harassment and abuse. His attorney, Howard King, expressed skepticism about the case proceeding to trial, asserting that Walters’ claims would not survive the next legal examination.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| January 7, 2026 | Judge Cochran grants motion to revive Walters’ case. |
| December 16, 2025 | Initial dismissal of Walters’ case. |
| January 1, 2026 | Effective date for Assembly Bill 250. |
Judge Cochran has scheduled a Case Management Conference for March 27. If a settlement is not reached, a trial will follow. As the case develops, it underscores the ongoing conversations around accountability and the legal avenues available for survivors of sexual assault.
