NHL Teams Weigh the Pros and Cons of Trading for Artemi Panarin
As the March 6 trade deadline approaches, NHL teams are evaluating the potential of acquiring Artemi Panarin, a highly talented left winger currently with the New York Rangers. Panarin, who is set to become an unrestricted free agent, has garnered attention due to the Rangers’ decision to retool their roster without offering him a contract extension. This development provides Panarin with leverage, as he holds a full no-movement clause.
NHL Teams Evaluating Panarin: Pros and Cons
Various teams have been assessed regarding the feasibility of trading for Panarin. The Athletic categorized them based on how sensible the trade would be. Here’s an overview of how teams stack up.
Teams with Strong Interest
- Dallas Stars: It makes a lot of sense. The Stars are looking to bolster their roster after coming up short in the Stanley Cup Playoffs. Panarin would complement their existing talent and fill a gap created by Tyler Seguin’s injury.
- Washington Capitals: It makes a lot of sense. The Capitals seek a top-tier winger to enhance their lineup alongside Alex Ovechkin, making Panarin a fitting target.
Teams Assessing Potential
- Boston Bruins: It makes some sense. Acquiring Panarin could enhance their offensive capabilities, but the associated costs pose a significant obstacle.
- Buffalo Sabres: It makes some sense. Panarin could strengthen the Sabres’ power play, but his willingness to waive his no-movement clause is a key factor.
- Tampa Bay Lightning: It makes some sense. Although the Lightning are contenders, their asset pool is limited, complicating trade talks for Panarin.
Teams with Limited Interest
- Calgary Flames: It makes no sense. Given their focus on rebuilding, acquiring an aging player like Panarin does not align with their current strategy.
- Chicago Blackhawks: It makes no sense. The Blackhawks are committed to a long-term rebuilding plan and do not see Panarin as fitting their timeline.
- Pittsburgh Penguins: It makes no sense. The Penguins aim to add younger, high-impact players rather than pursue an expensive veteran rental.
- Vancouver Canucks: It makes no sense. As part of a rebuilding phase, acquiring a player like Panarin does not align with their needs.
Other Considerations
- Florida Panthers: It makes some sense, contingent on cap space and potential retention of Panarin’s salary.
- Seattle Kraken: It makes a little bit of sense. While Panarin could elevate their offensive play, the team must weigh the implications of a rental player over 30.
In summary, Artemi Panarin presents both opportunities and challenges for NHL teams. His impressive skills make him an attractive option, but the financial and strategic implications of acquiring him will dictate how interested teams ultimately become as the trade deadline approaches.
