NHL: Unusual Penalty May Lead to Rule Changes (Hockey)
The NHL is currently considering potential changes to its video review policies. This discussion arises in the wake of an unusual penalty incident involving Lane Hutson and Marcus Foligno during a recent game. Hutson was penalized for tripping Foligno despite no contact occurring between them, prompting controversy and debate about officiating accuracy.
NHL Officials’ Review Process Under Scrutiny
The incident took place at the Wild’s home arena, where referee Eric Furlatt issued the penalty. Following the call, Furlatt expressed regret to Hutson for the decision made during the match. This has led to questions about the adequacy of the current review system in the NHL.
Proposed Changes to Video Review Policy
According to insights from TSN’s Darren Dreger, the NHL is analyzing options for enhancing the flexibility of video reviews. Currently, referees can review certain penalties, such as high sticking or major penalties. However, the ability to review tripping calls, like the one involving Hutson, is not available.
- Lane Hutson penalized for tripping Marcus Foligno.
- The incident involved no actual contact between players.
- Referee Eric Furlatt apologized to Hutson during the game.
- The NHL considers introducing a 30-second review window at the penalty box.
- Existing reviews cover high-sticking and major penalties.
Implications for Future Games
Dreger emphasized that the situation could have severe repercussions had it occurred during the playoffs. “This kind of error could easily have been remedied by officials,” he stated. The NHL is focused on minimizing mistakes in officiating, which happens frequently in a fast-paced sport like hockey.
As discussions continue, the NHL aims to explore whether these potential changes could lead to more accurate officiating and better overall gameplay. Fans and players alike are eager to see how the league will address these concerns moving forward.
