Jack Smith Testifies Before House on Trump Investigations: NPR

Former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee on December 17, 2025, in Washington, D.C. This marked Smith’s first public defense of his decisions and findings related to the criminal indictments against former President Donald Trump.

Key Developments During the Testimony

Smith stated that his team had collected substantial evidence to support the indictments. He emphasized that the accusations against Trump were serious and alleged that Trump was primarily responsible for attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Defense Against Accusations of Political Motives

• Smith faced criticism from Republican committee members regarding the gathering of phone records from lawmakers.
• Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, accused Smith’s investigations of being politically motivated.
• Smith rebutted these claims, asserting his impartiality: “I am not a politician and I have no partisan loyalties.”

Smith highlighted the gravity of the Capitol riot, noting that 140 law enforcement officers were injured during the violent event. He stated the insurrection would not have occurred without Trump’s actions.

Comments on Trump’s Actions

In a recorded deposition released by congressional Republicans, Smith referred to Trump as “the most culpable and most responsible person” in the conspiracy. He expressed confusion over Trump’s decision to pardon individuals involved in the Capitol attack shortly after taking office.

Smith’s Stance on Intimidation and Future Investigations

Throughout the hearing, Trump took to social media to denounce Smith, labeling him as a “deranged animal.” He suggested that the Department of Justice should investigate Smith for his actions.

• Smith stated, “I will not be intimidated.”
• He anticipated possible repercussions from the Trump administration, including efforts by the DOJ to penalize him.

Furthermore, the investigation into classified documents found at Trump’s Florida residence has garnered heightened scrutiny. A judge appointed by Trump, Aileen Cannon, has prevented the release of Smith’s related report, despite calls for transparency from various organizations.

Conclusion

The testimony of Jack Smith marks a significant moment in the ongoing scrutiny of former President Trump. As investigations continue, the implications for both Smith and Trump remain uncertain.